Skip To Main Content

Facility Planning

D.C. Everest is engaged in a long-term facilities planning process in partnership with construction management firm Findorff and architect and engineering firm Somerville. 

DCE has established a well-deserved reputation as an innovative leader in education. A critical part of that involves safe and accessible learning environments that meet today’s standards. While we address routine maintenance annually, we have catalogued a number of safety, accessibility and infrastructure challenges at the 75-year-old DCE Junior High that need to be addressed. Further, decreasing enrollment trends and 4K/Early Childhood space constraints have led us to examine how we can better optimize available classroom space as part of this process.

After careful review of options, the Board has chosen a proposed solution that would right-size the District by demolishing most of the Junior High and moving 8th graders to the DCE Middle School and 9th graders to the DCE Senior High with targeted additions and remodels at each school.

We are currently in Part 3 of the facility planning process — refining building and site options, and prioritizing needs based on board, student, staff and community feedback. This summer, we also are examining opportunities to update student pathways, modernize course options and reimagine learning so every student is prepared for their future.

As the District moves forward with the facility planning, student, staff, family and community feedback will remain an integral part of the process. Please refer to our "Community Engagement" section to view upcoming opportunities to learn more about the DCE facility planning initiative, ask questions and provide input.


 


 

Options We Considered

In February 2026, the District presented the DCE School Board with three options concerning the DCE Junior High. After careful review, the Board instructed the Facility Planning team to explore in greater depth the DCE Junior High option to redistribute grades. 

Renovate Junior High for Maintenance Needs and Learning Environment

Construction Budget: $38.1–44.1 M

Long-Term Sustainability: Low

Considerations:

  • High cost to maintain a 75-year-old building we no longer need due to declining enrollment
  • No operational savings

Build New Junior High on Current Site

Construction Budget: $90–104.2 M

Long-Term Sustainability: Low

Considerations:

  • Unnecessary debt
  • No operational savings
  • Doesn't solve the problem of having too many buildings to run
  • Inefficient community investment

Redistribute Grades with Targeted Remodels and Additions

Construction Budget: $81.2–94.1 M

Long-Term Sustainability: High

Considerations:

  • Increases student course and extracurricular options and access to at-risk pathways
  • Creates staffing efficiencies
  • Lowers daily and annual operational costs

 

Recommended Base Plan

After careful review, the Board instructed the Facility Planning team to explore in greater depth the DCE Junior High option to redistribute grades (8th graders to the DCE Middle School and 9th graders to the DCE Senior High). Below are site plans illustrating the proposed changes — including targeted remodels and additions, as well as improved parking and traffic flow for dropoff/pickup.

The base plan:

  • Avoids costly capital maintenance and reduces operational costs. Simply repairing the aging Junior High is a short-term fix. Closing sections of the school (reducing the footprint from 170,961 square feet to 72,189 square feet) is a long-term strategy that would save the District money by operating fewer sites and utilizing more efficient spaces — reducing the costs associated with heating, cleaning, and maintaining facilities.
  • Addresses declining enrollment. Moves students into fewer, more efficient buildings with learning spaces that meet today's needs.
  • Redistributing grades means all students would have one less transition, This plan would provide freshmen with earlier access to Senior High courses and labs. It also would provide secondary students with more course options as some electives are not currently run due to low enrollment numbers. With an additional grade in each building, these electives would be more likely to run.

Why now?

The aging infrastructure issues at the 75-year-old Junior High will lead to future, costly emergencies. In addition, the District is experiencing declining enrollment and this trend is predicated to continue into the future. Further, DCE's mill rate has been declining since 2019.

The District is at a unique crossroads where we can do more than just fix a temporary problem: we can set up our District for longer-term, future success. This is an opportunity to match our physical space to our shrinking student population and reinvest the savings into our students while elevating the DCE learning experience and expanding student opportunities in a fiscally responsible manner.

Since 2019, DCE’s mill rate (the amount of tax a property owner pays for every $1,000 of their property’s assessed value) has been declining. At the same time, the District has been prepaying debt from the 2018 referendum, which has saved taxpayers nearly $10.8 million in interest costs. Because of this careful financial planning, there’s an opportunity to invest up to $97.1 million without increasing the debt portion of the District's property tax mill rate. The proposed plan is estimated to cost up to $94.1 million.

DCE Head Count

DCE Mill Rate

DCE Junior High

(Established 1951)

  • Demolish most of the building and turn it into green space or additional parking as needed (footprint to decrease from 170,961 SF to 72,819 SF). 
  • Remaining portion, which houses the majority of 2018 mechanical upgrades, to be remodeled to include:
    • Locker rooms
    • Wrestling/multipurpose athletics space (provides additional options during poor weather)
    • Restrooms.
  • Resurface existing parking lots.
  • New path between the building and the stadium for safety purposes.

Estimated cost: $8.9 - 9.9M

Junior High Site Plan

Site plan for DCE Junior High

DCE Middle School

(Established 2002)

  • Additions to include:
    • New classroom wing
    • Restrooms
    • Common spaces.
  • Renovate commons, student services, therapy offices, nurse/health and additional office spaces.
  • Improve the parking lot with new drop-off/pick-up traffic flow for cars and buses (for both Mountain Bay and the Middle School) and a new staff parking area at the DCE Middle School.

Est. cost:  $39.1 - 45.2M 

Middle School Site Plan

DCE Middle School site plan

DCE Senior High

(Established 1969)

  • Additions to include:
    • New classroom wing with lab spaces
      Restrooms
    • Stairs and elevator
    • Common spaces
  • Renovations to include connection for new addition and FACE classrooms.
  • Separate bus and parent drop-off/pick-up traffic and build a new staff parking lot connecting to Heuss Avenue

Est. cost: $33.1 - 38.4M

Senior High Site Plan

DCE Senior High site plan with new traffic flow/parking, additions and remodels.

 

Additional Project: Pool

If the community supports the above recommended base plan, the District could update the 50-year-old Senior High swimming pool, which is  approaching the end of its service life and experiencing routine failure of its aging systems. Compared to more modern facilities, the pool has fewer lanes and less spectator seating. The District is seeking feedback from the community concerning three proposed options:

  • Option 1. Repair the existing pool. (Estimated capital cost $2.6 - $3M)

  • Option 2. Build an 8-lane pool with expanded spectator seating. The facility would include community access. (Estimated capital cost $21.5 - $24.9M)

  • Option 3. Build an 8-lane pool with expanded spectator seating and a zero-entry/warm-water recreational pool. The ADA-accessible, warm-water pool could be used for youth swimming lessons, by students with a physical disability, for physical therapy and community fitness. The facility would include community access. (Estimated capital cost $29.6 - $34.3M)

The operational costs of options 2 and 3 would be higher than the current operational costs of the Senior High pool because a pool at GTCC would be open to the community (the current DCE Senior High pool is not open to the community) and therefore have extended hours and expanded staffing. The District estimates the operational cost of running the new facility could increase taxpayers' mill rate by $.06 - $.07 cents annually.

If option 2 or 3 are selected, the current Senior High pool would be infilled and converted to a multi-purpose space that could be used for dance, wrestling, phy ed, martial arts, performing arts, and other purposes.


 

September 2026
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat/Sun
Monday, August 31
Tuesday, September 1
Wednesday, September 2
Thursday, September 3
Saturday, September 5
Sunday, September 6
Monday, September 7
Wednesday, September 9
Thursday, September 10
Friday, September 11
Saturday, September 12
Sunday, September 13
Tuesday, September 15
Wednesday, September 16
Friday, September 18
Saturday, September 19
Sunday, September 20
Tuesday, September 22
Wednesday, September 23
Thursday, September 24
Friday, September 25
Saturday, September 26
Sunday, September 27
Monday, September 28
Tuesday, September 29
Thursday, October 1
Friday, October 2
Saturday, October 3
Sunday, October 4

Happening Now

September 2026

During this month, we will expand our efforts to present facility plan information in person with a series of information sessions and tours hosted at the DCE Junior High, as well as numerous presentations at the board meetings of local municipalities.

In addition, a community-wide facility plan survey will be sent to DCE staff, families and all District residents. The deadline to submit the survey is October 9.

Summer 2026

The facility planning team and its partners:

  • Worked on developing a community survey that will be distributed to all DCE Area School District residents in mid-to-late September. 
  • Met with municipal leaders and boards to share information about the proposed solution.
  • Refined cost estimates and site plan drafts.
  • Collaborated with District leaders on plans to review, refine and revise the secondary curriculum and course offerings to ensure the District is meeting the needs of today's students. Upon their return, staff will provide critical feedback concerning the current 6-12 course sequence, program effectiveness, career pathways and help us reimagine 6-8 and 9-12 models, culture, schedules, supports and experiences.

 


 

Student Input

While conducting the facility, enrollment and learning space studies, we collaborated with students to gather feedback. We asked some grade 9-12 students how they felt about moving 8th graders from the Junior High (JH) to the Middle School and freshmen to the Senior High (SH). The vast majority were in favor of the moves. Highlights follow.

  • Easier academic transition. "It would make the academic transition easier for freshmen. Being at the Senior High will “make it click” for them that their actions and grades matter and help them mature.
  • Better course choice and access. "I think I would get a broader palette of courses to choose from if we had 9-12 at the Senior High. It would be nice to have access to more advanced courses in 9th grade."
  • Easier to participate in extracurriculars. "It’s difficult for freshmen athletes - different school schedules and bussing interfere with weightlifting and practices." Another added, "I couldn’t play with the orchestra at the SH and I felt that stymied my growth."
  • Freshmen should be part of the high school experience. "They feel isolated from the high school experience. It would be nice for them to be at the Senior High so they feel more engaged and comfortable. It would improve school spirit."

Opportunities to Improve the DCE Learning Experience

We also hosted information sessions and asked Junior High staff to share their opinions concerning the Junior High learning environment. Based on the findings of our three studies and staff and student feedback, we identified the following opportunities to improve the DCE learning experience by educating 8th graders at the Middle School and 9th graders at the Senior High. Highlights are as follows.

  • Increased likelihood of courses running for all grade 6 - 12 courses. As enrollment continues to decline, having more students under one roof improves the likelihood of courses meeting the registration threshold and being taught.
  • Improved access to advanced courses and at-risk pathways for freshmen.
  • Opportunity to expand secondary course offerings to meet the needs of today’s high-demand career fields.
  • Access to advanced labs for all grade 6 - 12 students. The dated lab spaces at the DCE Junior High are — in some instances — non-functional.
  • Afterschool activities can begin earlier, allowing students to get home, finish homework and rest sooner.
  • One less transition (and the anxiety that can be associated with this) between secondary schools for all students.
  • Improved learning environments for secondary students in buildings that have more natural light, collaborative study areas, updated classrooms and larger art/music spaces.
  • Opportunity to create cohesive 6-8 and 9-12 school cultures and expand extracurricular opportunities at both schools.
  • Improved ADA compliance and accessibility.

 

Timeline

  • May 2026 - At the Board Workshop, the DCE facility planning team and representatives from Somerville and Findorff presented the Board with a high-level overview of a four-year plan to review, optimize and redesign the DCE 6-8 and 9-12 learning experiences and craft stronger supports and school cultures within these new models; plan updates and projected costs to redistribute grades and improve traffic flow/dropoff/pickup; projected costs associated with either fixing the 50-year-old pool or constructing a new pool facility at GTCC that would be open to community use; prevailing themes from the staff and family survey; data indicating overwhelming support for the redistribution of grades, as well as a new pool at GTCC; existing DCE District debt projections, financing options and projected mill rate impact if the District were to go to referendum; and facilities referendum timeline roadmap.
  • May 2026 - The Board charged the District with moving forward with crafting a plan to go to referendum in Spring 2027 and continue with its work on educational redesign.

  • February 2026 - Facility planning update sessions for DCE Junior High and Early Childhood/4K leadership and staff
  • February 2026 - Facility planning board workshop; Board instructs District to explore in greater depth the DCE Junior High option that educates grade 9 students at the DCE Senior High and grade 8 students at the DCE Middle School. Further, the District will examine how to improve the Early Childhood/4K experience within existing plans and budgets by optimizing existing available space. And the District will provide the Board with additional information and strategies concerning a potential referendum.
  • January 2026 - Facility planning update at DCE Administrators meeting
  • October 2025 - Host DCE Junior High staff listening session
  • September 2025 - Tour and interview leadership at Idea and Odyssey Elementary; host Superintendent’s Student Advisory listening session and Early Childhood staff listening session
  • August 2025 - Tour and interview leadership at Rothschild Elementary, DCE Junior High; interview DCE Junior High and Senior High Athletic Directors and Director of Buildings and Grounds, School Nutrition and Special Education
  • July 2025 - Tour and interview leadership at Hatley, Weston and Evergreen Elementary, DCE Senior High; interview Director of Teaching and Learning
  • June 2025 - Tour and interview leadership at DCE Junior High, DCE Middle School and Mountain Bay and Riverside Elementary
  • May 2025 - 4K leadership tour and interview

Background

In fall 2024, the DCE District identified three key challenges impacting our facilities that required exploration. 

  • Enrollment decline during the past 10 years
  • 4K/Early Childhood space constraints within elementary schools coupled with decreasing community partner sites
  • Aging infrastructure at the DCE Junior High

To explore these challenges and determine the most cost-effective use of our facilities, DCE partnered with construction management firm Findorff, architect and engineering firm Somerville and the Applied Population Laboratory of the University of Wisconsin-Madison on a series of facility and enrollment studies. These studies were used to provide the District with the information needed to explore all available options and ensure we can provide DCE students with safe learning spaces while being fiscally responsible. 

In conducting this work, DCE and its partners have examined current facility needs and future educational needs based on:

  • Capital costs and needs
  • Operational costs and needs
  • Academic outcomes
  • Learning and school experience